![]() |
Sync is an in-dashboard gadget, controllable via voice recognition or steering-wheel controls, that lets you navigate and listen to audio players (includng iPods as well as Microsoftian models), transfer contact info from a phone to the car via Bluetooth, and listen to phone text messages via text-to-speech audio, among other things. (It also has a USB port that lets you charge your various mobile gizmos on the go.) It'll be available in twelve Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury models this year, with plans to bring it to all Ford Motor Company vehicles by 2009. Ford's deal with Microsoft will make it the only car company with Microsoft Auto-based products until the end of 2008.
As I chatted with Fields, I got the sense that he's used to his conversations with journalists centering around the recent woes of Ford and the entire U.S. car industry, since he spoke of Sync not just as an interesting, innovative, and (one hopes) useful device, but as tangible evidence that Ford has its act together. Sync "shows that our turnaround is product-led," he said, saying that in the past, Detroit has often released technology products that weren't always easy to use and which didn't always even solve real problems for customers.
Why Sync, and why now? Fields pointed to the explosion of Bluetooth-equipped phones in recent years, as well as of digital audio players, and said that Ford sees Sync in large part as a safety product, one whose voice commands and steering-wheel buttons will help drivers keep their eyes on the road. And he said that only now was it possible to make such a system seamless and simple enough to be truly practical.
"We're trying to leapfrog the competition and customers' expectations," he said. And he added that Sync will be upgradeable, letting Ford add new features over time without making customers buy new hardware.
I asked him why Ford chose to work with Microsoft on this project, and his answer was surprisingly human rather than technological. He said that Bill Gates and Ford Chairman Bill Ford are friends, and that Gates's philanthropic efforts have included donations to Greenfield Village, the living history museum founded by Henry Ford.
"Microsoft is a great American company with a history of innovation, and Ford has a similar background...the two teams have worked really well together," he said. And he said that it's been instructive to work with a company that has "a different clockspeed" than Ford, noting that the auto business is one in which new products are typically in the works for three to four years before they see the light of day.
For now, Sync is an option, and one at as price which hasn't been announced, although Fields told me that Ford will "make it a very good value." But he does think that networking will eventually be as standard a feature as a CD player is today--"not near-term or short-term...it'll be a while out, but I see a day when it'll happen."
Talking to Fields about Sync was intriguing. Coming to any conclusions about the system, however, is something that's impossible to do without seeing (and hearing it). I like the idea--I also wonder about Microsoft's ability to build the sort of rock-solid, utterly simple device I'd want in my car, espcially since "Bluetooth" and "seamless" aren't two words I naturally think of in conjunction with each other.
Fortunately, I should get the chance to see Sync close up later this week--and when I do, I'll report back here.
Stay tuned for that and other CES news...and check out all the show coverage that my PCW colleagues are already cranking out, even the show really gets underway tomorrow.
I wonder what Microsoft's reliability (lack of) and security vulnerabilities will do for the automobile as we have come to know it. I wish my MS-based computers worked as well as my cars do, but they are not even close, not in deed nor in expectation. I wonder what the open source folks have going in telematics?
Brad Erlwein
I have a serious question! Why don't cars come with a universal hard drive? It would be used to track any and all work done on a car! Any licenced mechanic would be required to update it any time they worked on a car. So you are going to buy a used car that is 5 years old. You could look and see if any excess body work was performed. Or if the oil was changed every 3k, 5k, or 16k miles. You could check for brake work or for transmission work. The only people who wouldnt like it are the garage mechanics who still change their own oil and do their own minor maintenance. The same "don't tamber" rules could apply to the hard drive that apply to the odometer readings. Yes a hard drive is pretty delicate, but companies make hardened computers, surely they could come up with one that could reside in a car for 20 years? That is my take anyway.
Using MS Windows for developing security strong product, especially now with Vista, comes as goo news meaning that 3rd party applications can be easily implemented. It would have been a disaster implement any of the above with OSs other than Windows for their unreliability, tendency to crash or hang typical of Apple based OSs and inexperience in the field of security as Windows has clearly paved the way towards a product robust in every aspect and generous in innovation and open platform