Quantcast
PC World: Technology Advice You Can Trust
Techlog
News, opinion, and links from Editor in Chief Harry McCracken.
Recent entries in this blog:
Sunday, May 21, 2006 1:37 PM PT Posted by Harry McCracken

End of an Era: No More Apple PowerBooks

100.jpg
I've read scads of coverage of Apple's new MacBook, but so far I haven't seen anyone dwell on one side effect of its debut: With the discontinuation of the 12-inch PowerBook, Apple has put an end to one of the longest-running hardware lines in its history. (And in computer history in general, come to think of it--in 1991, when the first PowerBook appeared, even the venerable IBM ThinkPad didn't yet exist.) It was an obvious fait accompli that the PowerBook name would go away when Apple announced the MacBook Pro in January; now it's reality.

The first PowerBooks appeared in October of 1991, and they were the first true Macintosh notebooks--the famously bad Macintosh Portable being an 15.8-pound monster.

They arrived to good reviews and lots of attention, in part because of innovative design that pushed the keyboard towards the display to make room for a wrist-rest area and a big trackball that served as a mouse substitute. The keyboard location was so instantly stolen by almost everyone else that it's hard to remember how unusual it seemed at the time. And the trackball was an attention-getter in part because many PC notebooks of that era had no pointing device at all. (Hey, much of the PC-using world was still living in DOS at the time; it wasn't a given that every computer user needed to mouse around.)

Looking at the page for the PowerBook 100 over at Apple-History.com is a nostalgic kick and an object lesson in how far we've come: The 100 had a 16-MHz, 16-bit CPU, 2MB of RAM (which could be maxed out to a roomy 8MB), a 20MB hard disk, a passive-matrix monochrome screen with 640-by-480 resolution, and a mono speaker. All for $2500, which wasn't a bad price for a portable computer at the time.

Compare that to today's entry-level Mac notebook, the new MacBook: The most basic version costs well under half what the PowerBook did, yet it's got 256 times the memory, 4000 times more disk space, more than three times the screen resolution in brilliant color, and stereo sound. And the 2-GHz Intel Core Duo is faster than the 100's CPU by so many orders of magnitude that I don't even know where to begin doing the math.

There were a gazillion PowerBook models over the years, but the most famous thing about the line probably wasn't the computers themselves--it was the mid-1990s "What on Your PowerBook" ad campaign. Apple fan site The Different District has a bunch of the TV commercials available for viewing. (It's one of numerous sites that carefully archives old Apple promotional material--is there even one site that does the same for Windows ads of yore?)

Note that while a jazz musician plays some tinny digital music, most of the answers to "What's on your PowerBook?" involved word-processing documents, spreadsheets and databases, and maybe the odd bar chart in scintillating 1-bit monochrome. Exciting stuff for the time, I guess--those ads undoubtedly sold a lot of PowerBooks. (Wikipedia says they held 40 percent of the entire notebook market at one point--an amazing stat if it's true.)

But ask the same question of someone about a modern notebook, and you might hear about beloved photographs, entire music collections, high-definition movies, and a whole lot more. Computers haven't just gotten more powerful; they've also gotten vastly more personal.

Not to mention the fact that in 2006, unlike 1991, much of what's important about PCs lies not on them but around the world on the awesome distributed information and communications network known as the Internet. (In 1991, a fair percentage of PowerBook owners didn't even have an e-mail address.)

Anyhow, I'm not that attached to the PowerBook name. Still, this is a little as if Toyota had discontinued the Corolla...which would be a Significant Moment even though the early Corolla bore about as much resemblance to the 2006 model as that PowerBook 100 did to the last PowerBooks that rolled off the assembly line.
Comments

I remember fondly my first PowerBook 100. What I really liked about it was to set up a RAMDisk and run the system off of that. Turn off the backlight (not really necessary to see the screen, and the battery would then last forever. I carried it around everywhere and people thought I was really "high tech". Too bad I got rid of it (I think I gave it to one of my nieces). My WinXP machine is nice and small but battery life sucks. I'm not looking for more functionality or more speed (I just write words for a living). I'm looking for more portability at a low price!

Dave
May 22, 2006
8:45 AM PT

It is sad to see the PowerBook name retired for the rather uninspired MacBook name, but such is the way of branding and marketing. Long ago, my first true notebook was a diminutive PowerBook Duo (what a cool concept). After several interim PB models I currently rely daily on a venerable Titanium PowerBook that's over 4 years old to do quite demanding graphic work. It still works flawlessly, if a bit slower than my desktop mac. Amazingly, until things like Adobe's Creative Suite are fully Intel-native I'll stick with my TiBook, as the performance gains are negligible and stability is still and issue. I'm excited about the visual appeal of the new black MacBook (sexy as hell), and love the features of the MacBook Pros, but until both are in their 2nd or 3rd iteration I'll stay away from beta-testing these first Intel macs.

Dominus
May 23, 2006
12:03 AM PT

I started with the PowerBook 145B (1993) and have progressed all the way to the last 12" PowerBook G4 and the 1.5GHz lower-resolution aluminum PowerBook. I've seriously considered moving the the MacBook Pro (15"), but I too will wait until Rev B.

I too am sad to see the PowerBook name go. I see very llittle connection between my current PowerBooks and that old 145B, but the name still gives a warm and fuzzy.

Andrew F.
May 23, 2006
7:23 AM PT

So what happens now? I'm a pc user thinking of transferring to mac notebooks...and do i go for the ibook and the powerbook coz they're cheaper? or should i go for the macbook?

(on tht note, will apple still support ibooks and powerbooks?)

Nid
May 23, 2006
10:37 AM PT

Back in high school I remember taking my PowerBook 100 to my teacher so that she could grade my report. Printer at home had failed and I needed to come up with something quick. This teacher had never seen a laptop before and I believe she was so impressed with it that she didn't bother reading the report and gave me an 'A' anyways.

Stanford
May 23, 2006
12:42 PM PT

The name change has everything to do with the ushering in of Intel CPU as the old names remind Apple of the past. And it is good also to avoid the confusion of G4 based with that of intel based Apple laptop. It is Apple's ever-fascinating ability to give us something new that attract the users. That is why, they are renaming it anew.
Come on, it is marketing. Give your machines a new name and identity, for goodness sake.

Anyhow, a few years down the line (10 years may be) Apple might reintroduce PowerBook again. Who knows?

NoHype
May 24, 2006
5:52 AM PT

"(on tht note, will apple still support ibooks and powerbooks?)"

Nid: As a long-time PowerBook user I can tell you that Apple will continue to support the iBook/PowerBook line for some time. That goes for hardware and software. Like all things 'tech', though, they eventually will drop support. Go ahead and take the plunge -- I'm sure you'll be glad you did.

Sprocket999
May 24, 2006
6:21 AM PT
Post a comment Post a comment
Archives
View posts from:
 

PC World's Marketplace

PC World's Free Whitepapers

Visit other IDG sites: