Saturday, March 04, 2006 3:14 PM PT Posted by Harry McCracken
As I've
mentioned before, I've spent the last seven months or so engaging in the questionable-but-interesting practice of running the beta version of Windows Vista as my one and only operating system on my work desktop here at PC World. I'm now on the most recent update--
build 5308, also known as the Enterprise Community Technical Preview, which Microsoft says is feature-complete. So it seemed like a good time to report in here.
First, a disclaimer: This is not a review, since Vista remains a work in progress. It's not even a comprehensive look at the state of the beta, just some random musings. Nine of them, actually:
This is the first beta that (mostly) gives you an inkling of what living in Vista might actually be like. For much of the time I've been working in Vista, I've been listening to coworkers justifiably tsk-tsking at me even trying to do so: Up until now, the beta's been sluggish, with major features either MIA or fundamentally broken. Major applications have refused to run; peripherals have failed to operate. It's been hard, in other words, to actually get stuff done.
Build 5308 is still cranky in some respects, but it is, clearly, a step forward. The OS still didn't identify my sound card (integrated SoundMAX audio, to be precise) during setup, but I was able, for the first time, to get it working in Vista. So far, no third-party applications have conked out, and there are fewer mysterious holes in functionality. (Like, for instance, the fact that the Windows Photo Gallery couldn't actually display photos in earlier betas.)
Note that I said "mostly." For instance, on this machine, at least, the new built-in search feature is still broken. It keeps telling me that I haven't indexed my hard drive...I keep telling it to index the drive...and then it tells me once again that the drive isn't indexed. So I have no thoughts on Windows' search interface other than that it's considerably simpler than in earlier betas...and considerably more like the Spotlight feature in Apple's Mac OS X.
Gadgets aren't fully baked yet. This beta has Vista's Sidebar, a feature which lets you run little applets called Gadgets, such as this analog clock and recycle bin:
In their current iteration, Gadgets feel like nothing more than a me-too emulation of Konfabulator (now known as the
Yahoo Widget Engine) and Mac OS X's Dashboard Widgets (themselves Konfabulator clones). But Microsoft's Widget platform has the interesting capability of letting software developers write one Gadget that can run in Vista, in a browser (via the
Windows Live site), or in a
new hardware feature for notebooks called Windows SideShow. That cross-platform ability seems more theory than reality at the moment--if there's a simple way to run a Windows Live Gadget as a Vista Gadget, or vice versa, I can't find it--but it could be cool and distinctive.
User Account Protection need more work. UAP is a security feature which involves Vista asking your permission before proceeding with potentially dangerous actions, remains a good idea in theory but a puzzlement in terms of execution. For instance, when I have UAP on, go into the Control Panel, and try to launch the Indexing and Search applet, I get this:
Why Microsoft thinks any normal person would (or should) know what "Run a DLL as an App" and "Microsoft Windows Component Publisher" mean, I'm not sure. Why it's telling me not to use the program if I don't trust the source, when it doesn't clearly state what the source is, I'm even less sure.
If this sort of thing remains in the final version of Vista, it might result in folks just clicking without thinking...which would be, in itself, a security problem.
Microsoft has a knack for confusing terminology. In Windows Media Player, what any other media player would call an "Artist" is a "Contributing Artist," which sounds like it might be a credit for someone who played the cymbals in the background. (It's a tad odd to see Ludwig van Beethoven identified as such on his own Symphony Number 9.) The Control Panel has a Network Center, a Network List, and a Network Map, and they're three different things. A feature called "People Near Me" involves folks on my network, and I suspect it can't tell if they're in the cube across the hall or halfway across the continent. And a new error message--Vista has a lot of new error-handling features--asked me if I wanted to turn off "Desktop Composition" without telling me what it was and whether I wanted it or not.
Some confusing items in earlier Vista betas seem to be gone (such as the notion of a "Library"), but I hope that Microsoft continues to clarify before releasing this OS. Especially since it
keeps telling us that Vista is all about bringing clarity to our digital worlds.
What's the deal with Windows Paint? Between Windows Photo Gallery and additional photo-related stuff built into Windows Explorer, there's a heavy emphasis on image management in this operating system...and yet Windows Paint remains
amazingly similar to what it was in Windows 3.0 back in 1990. If the new Photo Gallery (see below) had a few more editing-related features, such as resizing, it might eliminate the need for Paint, but instead it actually includes a menu item for
launching Paint, as if Microsoft thinks a lot of us will want to use it.
Even better media integration would be...even better. Vista has a new version of Windows Media Player (which looks to be more streamlined and usable) and an image organizer/basic editor called Windows Photo Gallery (which is similar to tools such as Google's Picasa and Adobe's Photoshop Album). But there's also more multimedia functionality built into Windows Explorer itself.
Here's Photo Gallery:
And here's Explorer, in a folder that happens to be full of photos:
As you can see, they're darn close in looks--and they're also close in functionality, although some tasks that are easy in the Gallery (such as assigning a rating to a photo) take more clicks in Explorer.
An operating system that incorporated truly powerful media-wrangling features deep into its file-management interface would be innovative indeed. Vista doesn't do that. But it comes close enough that I wonder whether Microsoft considered true integration...and if so, why they didn't do it.
Vista's approach to menus still drives me bonkers. I've
ranted about this before: Microsoft seems to have decided that plain old Windows menus are confusing...so in many parts of Vista, they're gone. But they're replaced with different things in different parts of the OS. Which--to me at least--is a lot more confusing than the alleged problem which Microsoft is trying to solve.
Here's a bit of the menu bar in Vista's Windows Media Player:
This is, in principle, an interesting idea: Click on a word (such as "Now Playing" or "Library") and you go to a tabbed section of the application; click on the little arrow below the word for the section you're in at the moment, and you get a menu. But that arrow is, indeed, little--and you've got to click rather precisely to activate the menu. Still, if Microsoft makes the menu-activating part of the UI a little larger, I'd like this.
Here are the menus in Photo Gallery, an application that in many areas was clearly designed to mirror the Windows Media Player interface:
As in Media Player, you have words and you have little arrows. But there's no distinction between clicking on a word and clicking on an arrow; either action gets you a menu. In short, Microsoft has introduced new inconsistencies rather than eliminating them.
Windows Collaboration looks interesting. It's a WebEx-like tool for doing presentations remotely. And it's peer-to-peer, so there's no server, and no service charges. Sadly, I'm the only person at PC World who's nuts enough to be working almost full-time in Vista, so I haven't found anyone to collaborate with yet. But I will.
Like I said, this may be a feature-complete operating system, but it's still a draft; I'm curious to see how much further all of this will evolve between now and Vista's ship date, whatever that may be. I'll continue to use this and future versions of Vista and talk about 'em here. If you've got any questions or thoughts, comment away.
What major features did Microsoft remove from Vista that they were originally going to include? i heard that there were some major features that had to get dropped due to time constraints.
I am a lab coordinator for a software company and had a problem with Vista 5308 this week. After installing it on three different model PC's, the system would crash with a blue screen shortly after loading. We could disconnect it from the network, and it would run successfully. If we left it alone on the network, it would cycle through restarts.
We tried it on a Dell GX270, GX280 and an comparable IBM (I just blanked the model at the moment) with the same results. Then we got the 5320 vendor build and successfully ran Vista on all three machines.
I got sound to work on the IBM and the GX280, but not the GX270 yet. Like you said in this article, sound didn't install during OS installation, but it installed from the Device manager when I reinstalled the driver.
Have you heard anything about network issues on the 5308 version? The version we have will expire every 14 days. Would like to get the 5308 to work. I will be running Vista on at least 6 machines soon, and later on around 25. It is a pain to reinstall so often.
I had similar problems with it on a machine I installed it on. I thought it might be my router. I have a DLink DI-624 on Cable. Couldn't get a connection to hold. Works ok off the internet service.
In reply to the comment below, WinFS, or Windows Future Storage, was dropped from Vista due to time constraints. It essentially entails the idea of keeping all your files in one "store" and having them sorted completely by metadata.
More info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/winfs
I believe I speak for most Windows users around the planet that the Windows OS has had a long history of interface inconsistency. Dear Microsoft, pleeeeeeeease banish this pernicious problem once and for all in the forthcoming Vista!
microsoft paint-- truly the least progressive "feature" of all windows releases-- has remained the purest, simplest, and most useful component of the windows operating system. (take that how you like.)
Have you heard anything about network issues on the 5308 version? The version we have will expire every 14 days. Would like to get the 5308 to work. I will be running Vista on at least 6 machines soon, and later on around 25. It is a pain to reinstall so often.
Babe, if you had the legal version, you would be able to activate your version of Windows Vista Beta and use it for the full length of the beta (IIRC, 180 days).
Please, stop spreading miss information.
I just installed Vista on an Emachines T6420, it detected the onboard network card (nvidia nForce) also detected built in sound card, but the sound does not work whatsoever (Detects it correctly, yet no sound from any of the ports) It did cause me to lose ALL access to the XP partition, could not boot or access it at all... No problem, thats what backups are for :)
Microsoft should fix the problems in XP first before rolling out another halfass product.
You should mention what apps you are using in your adventure. Email, productivity, utilities / tools so we get a better idea of what you are doing.
I would be really pissed if they messed with Window's Paint. It's one of the few Window's features I actually USE. I don't do heavy image editing, but the little I do, Paint is perfect for. It's easy to use, and i've been using it....forever. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If I need a more fully-featured editor, i'll get Photoshop. But leave Paint alone.
What is really scary about the whole issue is that they are suppose to release vista sometime this year and they are having such issues with the beta versions. I hope Microsoft can clean up their act before they loose more customers than what they have already
"But Microsoft's Widget platform has the interesting capability of letting software developers write one Gadget that can run in Vista, in a browser (via the Windows Live site), or in a new hardware feature for notebooks called Windows SideShow."
That's great. Now we can have Gadet-class viruses. Is this capability really a good idea?
Hi, I am a home user, I have two children who are gamers and go online for some games. I have a wife who is just setting out to learn basic uses for the p.c. such as email. I myself, with nothing except browsing experience get to try troubleshooting every time there is a problem. What would help me would be a media player capable of playing every type of media file. I would love it if I didn't have to choose an app. to open a file because I often choose the wrong one and then am stuck with the results. I imagine that if media player could tell what codec I needed to play a file and then get it for me and install it, my problems there would be over. That would be fantastic, I'm lost with all the xvid, divx, vorb orbis, ogg, avi,wmf, choices and don't want to be facing this problem for the rest of my life or have a machine with twenty different media players. Anything else to simplify the emailing would be great. I have hotmail, if I want to "send page" the computer automatically uses Outlook Express which can't work for some reason and I don't know how to make it work. I have to copy the page and open hotmail and then send the page after pasting it. I'd prefer a one click solution to this and not have to learn anything else. thanks very much if you can help with this...
p.s.
I don't want to install power point or programs like that either to see one email a year sent using that..
Peter Kerr: Yeah, that would be a good idea for the media player, but I have to imagine it would be hard to implement. Those codecs are all third party, and there's no real way for the media player to KNOW what it needs until it has it, if that made any sense.
It's kinda like Congress. They didn't know they needed Blackberry's until they had them.
Matt: Babe? :::tsk tsk::: Anyway... the 5308 does allow you to keep the OS for the 180 days and activate it, but the OEM version does not. It expires in 14 days. I suspect the "other version" mentioned in the post is probably referring to the OEM version and it will not allow you to activate it.
Perhaps you don't know everything about licensing as you seem to presume.
Ladiesman: hey, I like the name, I remember that guy on SNL, Tim Meadows played him, I'm sure you knew.
I downloaded a little program which analyzes files. It tells me what type of file it is and I then have to look for the way to open it. I thought if all this could be incorperated into the Media Player and if the Player could download and install approved software to allow it to play the file, that would be Brilliant. I have bought DVD ram recorder, DVD R+ and R- DVD with dual layer...etc. I can burn a DVD on my lap top which won't play on my desk top which may or may not play on my DVD Ram/DVD-R VHS combo player recorder (panasonic), it's crazy Now I'm reading about the New but competing DVD technology about to be released by Sony and Toshiba. I just bought all kinds of gadgets to burn my VHS family video's to DVD so my kid's can have them in the future, but the way things are going it seems hopeless. I don't know why they can't work on perfecting and simplifying one format and making it as user friendly as they can. I am on a steady Aspirin regimen now, I never had to take those before. Technlogy is taking too much time out of my day as I try to figure it out. It's not good that the DVD recorder can transfer my tapes to disc but I have to read for an hour to find this out and which button to press when. Also, my kid's are constantly messing up the computer and can't tell me how. If the computer could analyze itself ancd correct mistakes that would be perfect. Why is there downloads to clean up my hard drive and get rid of duplicate on non used files, why can't the O.S. have this ability built in?
I want the computer to be simple, I don't want to have to learn a new language and I don't want to learn a new trade just to make the thing do something simple, like open a video or burn a dvd my home player can then play.
I am getting headaches thinking about it all the time and it's getting worse instead of better. I need technology to simplify my life, not complicate it and eat all my time. I would pay twice the ammount for a computer if it could look after itself.
Sorry to go on so much, but I got two cell phones and they gave me two little MP3 players, my kids were thrilled to get the players, for some reason when I use media player to transfer the music to the player, it says it has done it but while my computer reads the content of the player, the player won't play all the songs which are on it. I can't figure this out either. I have a brother who is a musician and I tried to load his songs onto the MP3 player, the media player "sincs" the files and transfers them but the player doesn't play them. When I plug the player back into any computer it will read the files in the player and tell me the songs are in there. I have no idea why they won't play. I can load say ten Led Zeplin songs which will play but maybe none of my Rolling stones songs will. I put all the songs from C.D. into the Media Player Library and I can listen to them all, but not on the MP3 player for some reason. I am tired of this crap with everything I buy. If I buy the old technology it works universally, a record worked on any record player in the world, a cassette tape worked on any tape player, a c.d. on any c.d. player so what's the use in getting more sophisticated technology which more or less takes all the pleasure out of these things at a high cost in both money and time?
Peter Kerr: Heh, yeah. I do know about the Ladiesman. He's my namesake!
About the file format thing, thus is the problem. Everyone has their own, and nobody wants to stop using theirs. Luckily, alot of players DO read most of the typees, but there are still oddballs. The problem comes from the fact that companies want to have THE format, while often times third party people come along and make BETTER ones. Much like DiVX.
The more tech advances, the worse it gets. Plus, there's all the anti-piracy crap nowadays that only provides a headache for people who get their stuff legit. The pirates still get past it.
Check out VLC Media Player if you want a player that will play most all formats.
Hi Pete,
I actually did get the VLC media player, but now I can't play my lost in Space shows in my media player. It's not that important, I am wondering why that is though? I have a video capture card so I can put stuff on my computer to watch when I go on the road, I can also burn discs of shows and watch them wherever without taking the original DVD with me. So, I had the lost in space series on my media player but since I got the VLC player I can no longer play that in media player, it won't play there. So, now I am wondering, I tried to burn a disc and watch a show on tv using my home player and while my home player used to recognise the disc and play the shows, now it doesn't. Have you any suggestions for that? The VLC media player is excellent though, it's so small and yet it works so good. It even played some Japanese animations which my kids had and couldn't open before, that's where I heard of ogg files, this is driving me nuts, my brains just not big enough! Isn't there some other program that can burn all these things so I can just play them on my home DVD which doesn't have the VLC abilities?
I'm not usually an open source fanatic, but one application that I'm evermost grateful for is called Mplayer. It can play a huge variety of music or video files, is simple to use (just drag & drop onto .exe file) and no codec rubbish!
I KNOW IM LATE ON THIS TOPIC, BUT CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP
WHERE CAN I DOWNLOAD THE VISTA BETA 1??
You dont download it you beg microsoft to be a beta tester and to address a msg from above "Microsoft should fix the problems in XP first before rolling out another halfass product." let me point out that microsoft has been working on vista for 6+ years where as with windows xp they only worked on for about 2.5 years.. so think before you open your mouth and stick your foot in it..
Wow, I realize that this discussion has long since ended but I could not resist responding to the last moron's comment.
All you've done is point out that Microsoft, a multi-billion dollar monopoly with virtually unlimited resources, can not make a stable, secure, efficient operating system (their flagship product). The previous comment was made to express their disgust with the fact that Micro$oft, in all of these years has never been able to fix the problems with XP. Now, as you have so graciously pointed out, they have spent all these years making a product that from all accounts, of every person who uses it, has issues (some major, some minor). What have they been doing all this time? Why is it so difficult to produce something that just works? OSX and Linux are both superior and they do not have a monopoly. In fact, wonderful Linux (which I use everyday after switching from Windows this year) has every feature that vista has either in it's core or through free add-ons.