Friday, September 01, 2006 4:04 PM PT Posted by Yardena Arar
Now it can be told: Microsoft dropped off a close-to-RC1 version of Windows Vista Ultimate here a few days ago and I immediately installed it as an upgrade to Beta 2, which I've been running for several months now. But while the true RC1 (Build 5600) may be a big improvement, my upgrade experience (with Build 5568) has been less than joyful. Nothing has been truly catastrophic, mind you, but I have encountered a lot of irritating quirks.
The first thing that happened involved a bit of dual monitor confusion. I have two 17-inch LCDs, and after the upgrade the former monitor 1 inexplicably became monitor 2 and vice versa. More annoyingly, only the former monitor 2 (now monitor 1) came to life after the post-upgrade reboot, and my mouse would not control anything in that window.
Fortunately, a reboot revived my mouse and while my monitors are still reversed, I was able to get things working the way they used to by flopping monitors 1 and 2 in my display settings (which in Vista are obscurely accessible through the vague-sounding Personalize icon in Control Panel).
The reboot (and subsequent restarts) produced another irritant: A window telling me that Vista couldn't find drivers for my Unknown Device. So something isn't working--but what? Your guess is as good as mine.
I got another little surprise when I first launched Internet Explorer 7, post upgrade: An error message popped up--something about a toolbar not being supported. However after I checked a box asking not to be bothered about the problem again, the message stopped appearing. I also have had no problem launching IE7.
I did get a scare the first time I tried to access the Web-based tools for adding and managing content for PC World's Web site. I had to log in, something I haven't had to do in a long time, and Vista wasn't accepting what I thought to be my usual user ID and password. Apparently the upgrade removed all my stored intranet log-in info, or some such. It took a while--and a conversation with one of our IT pros, who was very helpful even though he isn't yet obligated to support Vista--to figure out the proper log-in format.
The good news: All my mission-critical applications (Word, Excel, Adobe InCopy, the Trillian universal instant messaging client, and the Palm HotSync Manager for my Treo 650) are still working. But they were working in Build 5384. And the apps I've missed most--Rhapsody, Adobe Photoshop Elements 4 (which for some reason won't accept the serial number on its package as valid in format!), and the Palm desktop and installation software--still don't work.
I'm also seeing one disheartening degradation in functionality: When I launch an application that for some reason doesn't play nice with Vista's Aero graphics, they go away completely (previous I still would get Aero Glass on windows for the other apps). And I still get occasional momentary total screen blackouts.
All in all, this latest build doesn't feel like a big improvement to me--so far. Hopefully, the kinks will go away, or Microsoft will straighten them out in the final leg of development.
Build 5536 running on AMD Athlon 64 and a MacBookPro. installed smooth as silk, in about 45 mins, Aero Glass looks good but is nothing spectacular. On Apple many Mac specific drivers are not there yet, also neither is Program Compatibility Wizard icon linked from the Vista desktop during install.
The TOTAL re-arrangement of the user interface, Control Panels and the toolbar for Internet Explorer is actaully going to be a big time-waster...many experienced users of Windows XP will be LOST for several days as they fumble thru oddball menus and Icons that were never there in XP, and later find the things they need renamed, and moved to totally new locations.
Other than the gooey Look and Feel (attempt to mimic Mac OS X, which is far better than Vistas look) they have actually gone backwards with the OS design. I predict major user disappointment, frustration. For Security, the User does more clicks in dialog boxes, leading to 2 steps back, and more lack of creative productivity/work.
Why does the writer of this article seem to be a novice in both their use of and reporting on issues related to an OS system uograde?
As far as swiftly's obviously biased comments above re mac osx, no one can test an os in few hours..no one...
but I will give you both some pointers: It is not a productivity LOSS to have to approve steps as admin on any desktop - the saved time from reduced downtime due to user improper action will be a blessing.
The screen issue mentioned at the top of the item is vendor driver specific and not OS related.
An expert should know how to find what devices drivers are not loaded, in fact all my kids can..
Why would it be a surprise that a toobar designed for a specific version of a browser did not work on an updated version of that browser, is this uncommon? nope
If you had exported your cookies and reloaded them after the update you would have ur login cookie - something any good security person would tell you not to do....
1000 character max.........
RC1 is a great leap forward for desktops..... the purveyors of this website should be descript of the technical, security, and user interface advances of this well done OS.
where's my post?