Quantcast
Today @ PC World
News, opinion, and links from the PC World staff.

Microsoft's Google Killer? First Glance at Search Engine Beta

Posted by Ramon G. McLeod | Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:59 AM PT

I tried out Microsoft's new search engine "Windows Live Search," aka www.live.com and it's a good thing they've labelled it a beta.

Touted by some as Microsoft's "Google killer," the new search engine was up and down for quite some time last night. I think I caught the developers uploading the UI because there were some really ugly versions before things started to settle down...

While the site was working, before it got overwhelmed with traffic (probably because the Drudge Report and other sites were flogging it) I did get a glimpse of the interface and had a chance to test some of the site out.

First impression: Big improvement over MSN Search. Google killer? No, not yet. But not bad either.

Beta Check

View image

The "live.com" default interface is extremely simple (hmmm, wonder who thought of that idea?). It's after you've begun your search that the fun begins.

When a search returns results, the page mutates and, besides the the classic search text entry box (and of course, your results), a series of tabs appear that allow for more custom searching and feed harvesting.

Nothing exotic, these tabs include "web", "news", "images", "local", and "feeds."

View image

The "web" results are very Google-like, and display returns in the now classic style: head, deck and URL. You can customise how much of this information you want with a handy little control on the right side of the interface. You can, for example, use the control (in the pop up image here you'll see it on the right side) Routine search returns were not stunning better (or worse) than Google. In fact, in my very early tests, the results from both sites were pretty close.

The strongest part of the tool, at least in my early look, is image search. I've never been totally thrilled with Google's image search tool, which requires more work then I like before I can get to the actual picture.

There are just about as many steps involved in getting to the picture in the "Windows Live" image search tool, but it feels friendlier. First, you get a bunch of thumbnails (like Google) but I liked the jazzy way the thumbnails "pop" open and give you a bit more info when you mouse over them in Windows Live Search. Click an image and the UI changes again to include the page where it originally appeared.

View image

Your original search results thumbnails are still visible, but re-located to the left side of the page. You can grab the original picture, sans web page, with the "show image" link at the top of the frame.

I found the "local" tab somewhat amusing when I typed in the word "Audio". Not knowing what to expect, I got a U.S. map and business address matches that were heavily concentrated in South Dakota. I know not why. Since I won't be shopping in Sioux Falls this week, I added an address to the search term and things improved a bit.

View image

The feeds tab worked well. After signing in to my Microsoft Passport account, I was easily able to add a few new feeds to "My Stuff" (View image). It was a little hard figuring out how to get back to "My Stuff" after grabbing the feed (clicking the "add to live.com" with the green cross will do it, but it's not exactly obvious), but I did like the clean display in the My Stuff area.

The site went down last night, so I couldn't try out more of its features, but it shows some promise...but then almost anything is going to be an improvement over MSN search...

We'll have a lot more on this site in the coming days, but do tell us your first impressions...Here's a pretty good backgrounder on the beta.

UPDATE: They've crudded up the live.com with promo material, news crawls, and announcements. Bleh.

Comments (10)

Thanks for the update. Seems kind of quirky. But I may switch as Google's secrecy, constant changing and moving of my sites results and my personal search results have me pondering looking for something better.

Bigberries.com
March 08, 2006
2:31 AM PT

I was doing a couple of obsecure queries, it has provided more results than Google for the most part. Though it has a resulted in many squatted domains that sells adsense space. It needs to get better at putting the more revelent pages at the top. Otherwise, it's going to turn into a hallway/doorway page paradise for SE spammers.

Primomailer.com
March 08, 2006
5:22 AM PT

One thing I noticed off the bat. It takes a couple of seconds just to load the front page. Even reloading the front page takes awhile.

This is one immediate advantage google has. Fast load time to the search engine that is.

VonKraut
March 08, 2006
5:57 AM PT

Looks pretty, seems to work reasonably well, lets wait till all the "nasties" have been ironed out.

amonra
March 08, 2006
12:02 PM PT

Is it just me or is it not working, cause can't seem to get it to search. I type in a search and the little bar just pops up again and nothing else. Maybe just a bug and it'll be fixed in a while...

Alena Kay
March 08, 2006
1:18 PM PT

I think the image search function is horrible compared to Google's. The nice thing about Google's is that you can immediately see the pixel size of each image... it's very rare that someone is looking for a small image (small images are the majority of ones that pop up in either image search) because they aren't as easily sized to what you want. Also, Google's image search allows you to go directly to the full-sized image instead of just taking you to the page the image is on and making you scour the page for it.

Greg
March 08, 2006
1:35 PM PT

It's Microsoft. BEWARE!! Run!!

Joe
March 08, 2006
2:55 PM PT

I did some sample searches to check on how well both google and live search penetrate the internet, google beats live search hands down!!! Yes everything else is much better than google...but well... wat is everything else if search results are not enough?

Atreya
March 09, 2006
12:06 AM PT

Wow, this is truly a new low for Microsoft.

The UI is horrible - this is just so the live.com team can say they use AJAX without actually implementing it a helpful way.

I can't middle click search results to open them in tabs in firefox.

I can't use the scroll wheel to go from results 1-7 to results 8-14. They seem to jump from 1-7 to 243-249. Huh?

Microsoft thinks it is being clever by putting the scroll bar within the page, but it works worse than a regular browser scroll bar and breaks regular scrolling functionality. This is an incredibly poorly though-out idea.

It is slow, slow, slow. The first page loads slowly, the results load slowly, the results scroll slowly.

Did I say the search results are irrelevent? I guess I did now.

r
March 12, 2006
10:05 PM PT

I Love it and I Hate it.
I love the Idea and the Content.
I Hate the Speed and the Stealing Focus.

Cricket
June 02, 2006
10:57 AM PT