Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:00 PM PT Posted by Yardena Arar
I thought I knew a lot about high-definition TV, but pride goeth before a fall: Here in Los Angeles at the HDTV Forum 2004, which seems to have drawn almost everybody who is anybody in HD-land, I learned that the HDTVs we've been testing so far don't really display the highest-resolution HDTV standards. Those are 1080i and 1080p, where 1080 represents the number of lines in a frame and i and p stand for interlaced and progressive, the way the frames are drawn (see the
HDTV Answer Guide for details).
Today's sets, I'm told, can only display 720p (another of the high-def formats) in its native resolution. These sets merely take the 1080i signal and downconvert it to 720 lines.
The first true 1080p sets are just starting to appear, and more vendors say they will be jumping into the market in the months to come. Of course, right now no actual 1080p content is available; (1080i is the closest actually in use by U.S. broadcasters), and don't hold your breath to see it.
Roadblocks to the full realization of HD's potential seemed much on the mind of HDTV entrepreneur Mark Cuban (he of HDNet and Mavericks fame). Cuban spent much of his allotted keynote speech time moaning about how compression is killing off the beauty of true HD broadcasts (which, uncompressed as shot by the Sony equipment his network uses, would require 1.5GB per second rather than the 19.4mbps capacity of the bandwidth the feds have given over-the-air broadcasters for their digital signal).
But someday--Hollywood and the Motion Picture Association of America willing--studios might make their movies available in 1080p, so if you want to be ready, it might pay to wait for a set that can actually display the format without down-coverting it. Then again, it might not pay to wait. Hollywood seems in no rush to make its content available in any high-def format, let alone the most high-def of the lot.
moaning ????
bitching maybe. but never a moan
Hey, it's a figure of speech. But I'm impressed that you're reading our blog (if you are indeed Mark Cuban).
The Benefactor himself! Amazing.
Seriously though, everyone used to think broadband for the home was going to be for only the rich and gluttonous (viz. the old PacBell "bandwidth hog"). HD Unplugged (i.e., uncompressed) will happen someday. In time for my distant descendents to enjoy, at least.
Am I right in assuming that a monitor running at 1920x1080 can display 1080p?
Assuming it's a progressive (versus an interlaced) display, I believe you are correct. In fact some of the vendors have pointed out that PC users are familiar with the format -- but people who are buying TVs will be looking for 1080p video content.
I think that if Hollywood and Blockbuster want to keep selling DVDs they will need to move to the Blue-Ray DVD and make it 1080p. The same wow factor that created the greatest exceptance of DVD was do to the fact that the picture was so much better then broadcast TV. The same can be done again with a 1080p TV and a DVD player that can Display a 1080p uncompressed Signal, That is when we will see HDTVs flying off the Selves as well as HDDVD players, much in the same way that DVD players have for the last few Years. In addtion WMV codec allows for and has created 1080p content, just need a fast PC to Play it hooked to a monitor that can display 1080p
Bollywood will make 1080P if Hollywood is too stupid.
Hollywood just wants to make cookiecutter films that have no originality and expect us to pay thier ransom. Well I am custommer I demand HD 1080P
Actually I want 10 times that resolution using lossless compression.
Go Bollywood, you Indians rule the lazy Holywoods asleep!