Quantcast
PC World: Technology Advice You Can Trust
Techlog
Consumer electronics news and views from Emru Townsend and Cathy Lu.
Recent entries in this blog:
Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:14 PM PT Posted by Emru Townsend

Thank the RIAA for Your iPod Playlist

Trust me -- I'd really rather be talking about cell phones, televisions and really cool gadgets right now, but the RIAA and MPAA keep distracting me with their antics. Here's the latest, courtesy of a report from the Electronic Frontier Foundation: fourteen organizations, including the two mentioned, have submitted a filing as part of the DMCA's regular review process of exemptions to the DMCA's provision against tampering with technological protection measures. As part of this filing, the argument is being made that copying a CD that you bought to your iPod does not, and has never, constituted fair use.

Let's break this down for the non-lawyers in the room. In essence, all rights to copy anything are held by the copyright owner. Those rights can be sold or assigned, which is why a record label can reproduce and distribute a given musician's songs. Since copyright holders haven't given you specific permission to make a copy of a song, you aren't allowed to, by the letter of the law.

Within American law, "fair use" is an exception that, among other things, allows people to make copies within certain circumstances and constraints. So making a copy of a CD for your own personal use is within the scope of fair use. That's the way copyright law has worked for quite some time. (We Canadians don't have fair use; we have its cousin, fair dealing.)

Except now this filing claims that the right to tote your CD's contents around on your MP3 player were never expressly given, and that, for some reason, fair use doesn't apply. The implication is that all this time, they've been graciously allowing us to make tapes and MP3s from the CDs we've bought for our personal use. No need to thank them. Really.

It seems like the RIAA will only be happy when we have to pay each and every time we listen to a song.

(For additional laffs, download the PDF of the filing and wade through the part where they make the claim that access controls -- DRM -- have only increased legitimate access to copyright works.)

Comments

You hit the nail on the head.
Pay every time you play the song!

Will They Be Happy Then?

acie
February 16, 2006
4:21 PM PT

No, I guess they won't be happy then.

The next thing they will be letting you pay for is if you are humming or whisteling a song. Let alone if you are singing it aloud, then you will have to pay twice, once for the music, and once for the lyrics.

But in they end, I will foretell you now, clever laywers will be telling the courts that any device a human is using is no more than a simple extension of our brains and body. So if you can remember, and play back a song by your mind and voice, so will you be able to do by your extensions, and no money should or can be gained from this feature of a human.

greyked
February 17, 2006
2:06 PM PT

Cool blog! Come visit my site. John Martinez

John Martinez
April 19, 2006
1:36 PM PT
Post a comment Post a comment
Archives
View posts from:
 

PC World's Marketplace

PC World's Free Whitepapers

Visit other IDG sites: