Quantcast
Community Voices
PC World readers share their point of view on today's tech news

Corporate Fraud Preys on the Vulnerable

Posted by pshapiro | Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:47 AM PT

On Tuesday, May 27, 2008 Dell was found guilty of fraud, false advertising, deceptive business practices and abusive debt collection practices. Corporate fraud preys on the vulnerable, the unprotected, the naive, the trusting members of our community. It steals their money and then steals their trust and dignity. All in the name of greater corporate profits. For shame.

Who is to blame in such situations? The easy answer is to look to the CEO and start pointing fingers. The degree to which Michael Dell is culpable in this scandal is something for a Congressional subcommittee to investigate. Look beyond the scapegoat, though, and you'll find a much larger failing.

Government agencies, whose duty it is to protect the public, are asleep at the switch. A court finding of fraud is not the way to address this kind of malfeasance. The harm has been done already and no restitution can make whole the victims of this fraud.

We need much stronger regulation of corporate activities if fraud of this kind is to be prevented in the future. Corporate antics in the modern age make the Wild West look like a subdued and refined age. It's time to rein in abusive practices. What's broken in this case of fraud is our government. Government is doing precious little to protect consumers against fraud. Our protectors are snoring. That should not be so.

Phil Shapiro
The blogger is an educator in the Washington DC-area. He can be reached at philshapiroblogger@gmail.com


(Earlier PC World article on Dell and fraud.)

Comments

Over the last twenty years I've learned that the punchline from the old joke [I'm from the government, & I'm here to help you.] really ain't funny any longer, if it ever was.
Its true that governments (state & federal) bear the primary responsibility for the fraud, false advertising, deceptive business practices and abusive debt collection practices. These things are like the other crimes against humanity that governments are responsible for, even though not committed directly by the government, the egregious activities could not have been perpetrated without the governments' tacit approval.
In general, governments no longer serve useful purposes, but only pretend to be of benefit to their victims.
Truly, the "fraud, false advertising, deceptive business practices and abusive debt collection practices" didn't begin with Dell (or any other corporate criminal) but with the governments that have forsaken their only purpose for existing; "To Protect and Serve."
JS

jon4pc1world
May 31, 2008
7:30 PM PT

The Software That Made My Life Easier

Posted by MattMik | Monday, May 26, 2008 3:33 PM PT

A few weeks ago, I was told to give a presentation for one of the classes I am taking. Unfortunately, I left it until the last minute (almost). Next weekend I will be away, and unable to finish making the presentation (which was when I planned to), so I rushed to put everything together this weekend.

The presentation was supposed to be a PowerPoint slideshow, but alas, I do not own PowerPoint. And I'm not a pirate. What else could I do besides use OpenOffice.org Impress, a popular PowerPoint clone, to create my slideshow? The best part was that OpenOffice.org could export slideshows in the PowerPoint document format, allowing my professor to open the file if needed.

So I went work, and the process was pretty straightforward. The program functions a lot like PowerPoint, although some parts may be a bit more complex. I noticed that it is often hard to grab onto a certain text box or image if it does not currently have the focus. I was also unable to locate superscripts and subscripts. However, the simplicity of installing a video into the slideshow saved me a lot of time. That's where my next problem came in.

I had to download a bunch of videos off of YouTube and insert them into the slideshow. I went onto YouTube, and thanks to RealPlayer, I was able to press a button and download them all directly to my computer using RealPlayer's instant-download function. However, I still had to convert them into .WMV files, and edit a few sections out. For some reason, Media Convert did not work for my videos, and I had to download the VLC Media Player, a popular open-source video and music player. VLC Media Player contains a wizard that allows you to convert various formats of videos to different formats, and thankfully it worked with my .FLV files.

Now I had to edit them. Because they were simple edits that involved cutting sections of video out, I just opened up Windows Movie Maker and spliced certain scenes out. After resaving the movies, they were finally inserted into the slideshow.

The final step (which I have yet to do) involves putting the slideshow, along with all the videos used, on a flash drive and bringing them in to use on a projector for my presentation. Thanks to all the software mentioned, I was able to get my project done in such short notice. Let's hope I don't fail!

Would you like to be a Community Voices blogger? If so, please send a letter of interest and a sample blog entry (what you would post here if you were already a blogger for us) to forums@pcworld.com. We'd love to hear your perspective.

Comments

The Gates of Yahoo

Posted by AuroraDizon | Friday, May 23, 2008 12:00 PM PT

A lot of talk has been about Microsoft?s bid to take over Yahoo recently. I didn?t question the move just Microsoft trying to take out more competition right? Could it be less of an offensive move and more of a defensive maneuver? Although many have tried and made impressive strides in recent years none still have been enough to storm the gates of the Google empire. Microsoft basically already has what Yahoo has to offer, so what would they really want from them? Why now? Could Google?s foray into Microsoft?s money maker, the operating system currently being developed for mobile phones, be enough for them to strike at the heart of Google?s own territory the search engine?

The Gates of Yahoo


Would you like to be a Community Voices blogger? If so, please send a letter of interest and a sample blog entry (what you would post here if you were already a blogger for us) to forums@pcworld.com. We'd love to hear your perspective.

Comments

GTalk Needs One More Feature

Posted by pshapiro | Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:40 AM PT

Last night I was teaching my graduate school class in educational technology and needed to have all of my college students in a group chat room. All of my students are required to have a GMail account, so I reckoned I could easily create a chat room within GTalk.

Not so. While it's possible to do a group chat in GTalk, I would have to add each student individually to the chat -- rather than select them from my GMail contact list. Within my class period I didn't have time to add students individually to a group chat, so we had to make do in other ways for the lesson I was teaching.

Ideally I'd love to save all the members of a group GTalk chat to its own group, so that I can easily recreate the group chat experience with a minimum of mouse clicks and efforts.

GTalk is a fairly new Google service. I'm hoping a better group chat experience can be added to an otherwise excellent service.

Phil Shapiro

The blogger is an adjunct professor of education at a university in the Washington DC-area. He can be reached at: philshapiroblogger@gmail.com

Comments

Copying and Pasting

Posted by techbetter | Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:33 PM PT

This week's tech tip is on copying and pasting. I am going to go out on a limb and assume everyone already knows what copying and pasting is. So I am going to address what I consider one of the most annoying aspects of copying and pasting in Windows which is text formatting. As I'm sure you have noticed at one time or another, when you copy and paste text between two programs, the pasted text usually keeps the formatting of the copy source rather than matching the formatting of the paste destination. This can be quite annoying at times because you usually have to spend time reformatting the pasted text to match the formatting of the place in which it was pasted. There are two simple solutions to this problem.

If you are working in Microsoft Word 2007, there is an option for how to handle copy and pastes located in the Word Options menu and then the Advanced section.

Click here to see where MS Word 2007 Options are located.

Click here to see where the Advanced section is located.

My favorite solution, however, is a little more old school. I prefer this solution because it works in all scenarios, not just in MS Word. This solution is to open Notepad which is the free text application that comes with MS Windows. To launch Notepad follow these two steps:

Click on the start menu and then the Run option.
Click here for an example image.

Type "notepad" in the Run window and press OK.
Click here for an example image.

(You can also find a shortcut to Notepad by clicking on the start menu, then programs, then accessories.)

If you paste anything into the Notepad program window, Notepad will clear all formatting and keep just the text. Then you can copy from the Notepad window and paste anywhere you like with no formatting. This is especially helpful when copying text from Web Pages where you may encounter embedded images and links in the text. Using this simple technique will strip away everything except the text and allow you to paste the text anywhere formatting free.

I hope you find the tech tip useful.

Happy Teching,


Ryan Williams

Ask Me A Tech Question
http://www.techbetter.com/question.aspx

View & Subscribe To My Tech Tips
http://blog.techbetter.com

About Me & TechBetter
http://www.techbetter.com/aboutme.aspx

Comments

Creat a shortcut key for notepad,then all you need do to open notepad is hit the key as I do (cntr+alt +n)

GWHrover
May 20, 2008
4:18 PM PT

Computers in the Media

Posted by MattMik | Sunday, May 18, 2008 6:23 PM PT

The other day, I was watching CSI, and I couldn't help but notice all the references to science, as well as computers, they made. For all I know, all the references to science were in correct context, but one thing caught my attention.

The episode was about a serial killer who would capture people in his taxi cab, and take them back to a warehouse to murder them. The killer eventually kidnaps a blogger to get his message out to the world. The investigators, back at the the station, are viewing his blog, and notice how the entries are being posted in real time. One of the investigators then stated that she would quickly code a program in Visual Studio to create a GUI interface to trace the IP address, and find where the posts were coming from.

There's a problem with this scenario. I will ignore the fact that programming a GUI interface would probably take longer than writing a command prompt program, and skip to the part that matters. How exactly were they going to trace the IP address? In order to get an IP address, they would have to packet sniff, and the blogger would have to be on the same network as the investigators, and chances are, he wasn't.

What would have happened in real life? Well, I would imagine it would go something like this. The investigator makes a call to the blog service that the blog is hosted on. If the service monitors what IP addresses connect to their servers, they could immediately respond with the address, but if not, more calls would need to made to the internet service provider that the blog service uses. Keep in mind that I do not work for the government or any investigation service, so some of this may be wrong, but in theory, the investigators' methods would not work.

I know that it's just television, and a bit of false information is okay, but I do believe that shows like CSI could gain more intellectual viewers (although I'm sure they have a lot of them already) if they included correct information, or at least a bit more info to explain their methods. Sure, it may not be relevant to the plot, but it couldn't hurt!

One intellectual show, although it is a comedy, that I enjoy watching is The Big Bang Theory on CBS. The show focuses on two ?nerds? who work in the field of physics, and is filled with various references to science, as well as the stereotypes of what intellectuals like to do with their spare time, such as playing MMOs and other video games as well as watching lectures by Steven Hawking.

I am glad to see that our television is not completely filled with idiotic references to nothingness (that means you, Family Guy). Although I do not watch television much anymore, I have to say that I am glad that I can sit down and watch a program that won't leave me feeling more idiotic than I was when I sat down.

Would you like to be a Community Voices blogger? If so, please send a letter of interest and a sample blog entry (what you would post here if you were already a blogger for us) to forums@pcworld.com. We'd love to hear your perspective.

Comments

I also love how every action the computer takes is accompanied by some sort of sound and fancy visual indicator. What ever happened to silence and a spinning hourglass? I know, I know...watching an hourglass spin isn't as entertaining as watching 1000 fingerprint scans flash by while the machine beeps like the audio of Bobby Knight in a press conference after losing a game.
I really enjoy CSI (Las Vegas), even though they do bend the rules some for entertainment value.

gundark
May 19, 2008
8:52 AM PT

Economic Stimulus Checks -- A Bonanza for Apple?

Posted by pshapiro | Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:29 AM PT

As many as 116 million American families (and individuals) will be receiving an economic stimulus check within the next few weeks. (CNN) How many of those checks will end up at Apple, as people decide to get their next iPod, their next MacBook, their next iPhone? I'm reckoning that more than a few checks will end up in Apple's coffers. Possibly in the range of 115 million checks.

Probably not that high, but it's interesting to consider people's overall spending habits as this unexpected cash falls into their laps. Suppose you bought a Vista laptop a few months ago and you've had your fill of Vista for now. An economic stimulus check makes that MacBook or MacBook Pro less of a dream and more of an impulse buy.

If you've had a chance to try out the Eee PC laptop, that's where you might send your money. I bought an Eee PC back in November and while I like it in general, I'll be selling mine to buy the newer larger screen version coming out in June. Asus made a mistake in designing the keyboard of the Eee PC too small. It's a great little laptop, but you can have too much of a good thing when you start reducing the size of electronic devices.

Back to Apple, I wouldn't be surprised at all if Apple rolls out a marketing campaign to coincide with the economic stimulus check deliveries. Showing an Apple product with the phrase, "Your economic stimulus check has arrived," is enough to break the willpower of roughly 116 million people.

Let's check back with Apple's quarterly sales figures for the next quarter. How large a spike do you expect to see?

Comments

You Don't Have to Pay for Computer Security!

Posted by MattMik | Sunday, May 11, 2008 1:31 PM PT

This week, I made a move that I am very proud of. I finally uninstalled McAfee Security Center. I know that some of you would call me an idiot, but McAfee's software was not protecting my computer at all. I never updated it, as I was always busy when those annoying popup dialogs would appear. Therefore, it wasn't helping.

But my computer isn't completely ope n to all hackers and viruses. I now run AVG Free Edition and COMODO Firewall Pro. Sure, they might not be as good as some of the software that you have to pay for, but they work for me. I also don't worry as much about protection as an average user might, because I believe that I am more tech-savvy than most computer users (hopefully). For example, I don't believe those Nigerian 419 scam letters I get in my inbox.

So here's the deal. I like AVG Free Edition better than McAfee, but why? AVG automatically updates its database everyday, and even though it might slow my computer while doing it, it runs before I start any major task I have to do. One thing I am not satisfied with, though, is the fact that AVG does not always remind you to scan for viruses. But if you are conscious as to what could happen to your computer if a virus does infect it, then you should be able to handle scanning by yourself.

COMODO Firewall Pro might not be as good as McAfee's Firewall, but it works just as well if you aren't too picky. For example, when a new program attempts to perform a certain action that COMODO is hesitant about, a big box will pop up on the screen. This box is considerably larger than the ones McAfee used. Finding the list of programs and their security rules also isn't the easiest task in the world with COMODO. However, I do like how it also can scan for malware, and will as soon as you install it.

So there's what I will be using to protect my computer for a while. I did not cover spyware, as I am still looking for a good program to use. I currently use Spybot, but I have not read the greatest reviews about it.

I feel like ending with one of those corny writer phrases. Hmmm...let's see....

Until next time, keep on computin'...?

Would you like to be a Community Voices blogger? If so, please send a letter of interest and a sample blog entry (what you would post here if you were already a blogger for us) to forums@pcworld.com. We'd love to hear your perspective.

Comments

@Pjotr Becase some people don't like Ubuntu!! It can't play games (don't say anything about wine, it's useless in games) and it has incompatibilities with some of the compoments of some laptops and desktops (internal modem of laptops, anyone?). It can't work properly with certain usb devices (external tv cards anyone?) and it has a lousy power managment (my laptop battery last only 2 hours in ubuntu, 3,15 in xp).

So, stop bragging (and spamming) irrelevant posts about your favorite distro, because you are off topic. OFF TOPIC!

If you have a freeware security suite to recommend, I am all ears, but if you want to brag about linux, I am not.

PS: Sory for the four posts above, but PCW had a hard time cooperating with my firefox (dont know why)

PPS: I have nothing against linux, but i have against users who try to promote it to every windows user they find, negleting what his needs may be (gaming, laptop battery, video capture with external tv cards) and if linux can cover them

kurkosdr
May 12, 2008
8:26 AM PT

Avast! Works well for me at home, and will be purchasing their server package soon for the 2K3 server I maintain. I find it to be fast and light on the resources (YMMV).

I still use ZoneAlarm for my firewall. I've even gone far enough to pay for a license of the Pro version because the product just works. You can't go wrong with trying free version, though.

I gave the McAfee suite a shot because it comes as a "freebie" with Comcast ISP. The McAfee suite slowed down all net traffic by at least 50 percent. It brought my kids' computer (1.6 GHz P4; 2GB) to a crawl.

Whatever you choose really depends on what works good for you and your particular hardware. With all the free packages out there, you're bound to find something that works for you. If you find something free that works for you, consider sending in a donation or purchasing a license if you have the means.

gundark
May 12, 2008
11:55 AM PT

I agree that it really not necessary to pay for security software. I use the combination of a Linksys router/firewall, Avast Anti-virus and Spyware Terminator. Of course I had to pay for the Linksys router/firewall but I needed it anyway for my home network. I haven't had any problems over the past few years using free software. I'm not sure why people would pay for this software when there are excellent free alternatives.

miked6Bdz
May 12, 2008
9:13 PM PT

It's Time for PCWorld to Change Its Name

Posted by pshapiro | Sunday, May 04, 2008 5:54 PM PT

For the past 20 years the words PC and Windows were almost synonymous. Ask someone what kind of computer they owned, and if they said, "I have a PC," then you knew they didn't own a Mac or Linux computer.

Times have changed. The Eee PC has taken the world by storm. Apple is resurging with full force. Linux is here to stay -- and can only grow in use on desktops, cell phones and other mobile devices.

So it's time to say goodbye to PCWorld and hello to a new name for this magazine and web site. What would be an appropriate new name -- a name reflective of the new multi-OS world we live in? DWorld might be it -- covering the digital world in all its multifaceted forms.

I have Mac friends that would never consider reading PCWorld (or the PCWorld.com) web site, despite the excellent, interesting and useful Mac articles you're find here. Same thing for my Linux friends. They would never casually browse PCWorld.com, because historically this magazine only covered Windows solutions.

It's time for a name change, a change that reflects the changing times. Any other magazine might not have the courage, but the leadership of PCWorld has courage aplenty.

You need courage to be a good leader. And you need to exhibit that courage consistently, so that people are reminded that you are leading and not following.


Phil Shapiro

The blogger has been working to bridge the digital divide for 20 years in the Washington DC-area. He loves Macs, adores Linux and likes Windows. Reader responses welcome in the comments below or at philshapiroblogger@gmail.com




Comments

I don't think we should change our name either. But I'm curious whether anyone thinks it somehow keeps us from being considered a credible source of information on other technology products we cover -- e.g., cell phones, HDTVs, etc.....

By the way, I don't understand the people who don't want to see coverage of Apple products here. I'm pretty sure a lot of iPhone and iPod owners also own Windows PCs. I personally am in a mixed marriage: My husband has an iMac, I have a Windows notebook.

Yardena Arar
Senior Editor, PC World, and proud of it!

yardena
May 08, 2008
6:14 PM PT

PCWorld is a better name now than ever!!!! Now that the Mac runs on Intel machines, which make up most of the PCs in the world, PCWorld is PERFECT!

If you change it, you'll be alot like Gateway, who changed their name from Gateway 2000 just before the year 2000. In my opinion, the 2000 hype could only have helped them. But, what if they took some initiative, and instead of changing their name. said that their machines were year 2000 compliant before anyone else. And that they would help you get that way! That's the way to build on a name instead of throwing it away!

You should just make sure you cover anything that has to do with Personal Computers. People will find you if you are good. Changing your name will be a killer. Ask Gateway.

hameiri
May 09, 2008
7:18 AM PT

It seems that the divide between Macs and PC's is smaller than people make it out to be. I'm about to cross the line and buy my wife a MacBook and some sort of desktop Apple for my wife's 40th birthday (please don't tell her), and I'm good with that. Why can't they all just get along?

And if you do float a name change, perhaps now is the time to do so, in the interregnum between Harry McCracken and whoever the new editor will be.

DaveMackey
May 22, 2008
9:30 AM PT

ASIO4ALL Enhances Your Sound Card!

Posted by MattMik | Sunday, May 04, 2008 3:49 PM PT

Many amateur music producers face the problem of selecting a decent sound card that will work well with their creations. However, because decent sound cards and interfaces are pretty high-priced, many producers who are just starting out do not have enough money to purchase one. Sometimes their sound card has great sound quality, but is not ASIO-compatible. ASIO (Audio Stream Input/Output) is a protocol for audio that was created by Steinberg and is used by many professional producers because of its low-latency and high-fidelity operations. Low-latency is especially important for musicians who use a computer with MIDI equipment, as it decreases the time between when a key is pressed and when a sound is heard.

Chances are the cheaper sound cards on the market do not support ASIO. Fortunately, there is a solution for Windows users called ASIO4ALL that acts as a universal ASIO audio driver for the majority of Windows-compatible sound cards. It uses kernel-streaming and a variety of other methods to achieve ASIO compatibility. All that's needed is a WDM (Windows Driver Model) compatible operating system (Windows Vista, XP, and 2000 all are), a WDM audio driver for your audio hardware, and, as the website says, a little bit of luck. Thankfully, ASIO4ALL worked with the crummy sound card built into my DELL laptop. If it works with that piece of garbage, I highly suggest trying it with your sound card.

ASIO4ALL will not replace or change existing sound drivers in any way, install components that could affect the stability of your system, and overclock your sound card. It will usually not void any warranties, too, and the best part is it's absolutely free!

By writing this article, I do not guarantee that ASIO4ALL will work with your sound card, and although ASIO4ALL's website says that it will not affect your system, I and ASIO4ALL are not responsible for anything that happens to your system!

Would you like to be a Community Voices blogger? If so, please send a letter of interest and a sample blog entry (what you would post here if you were already a blogger for us) to forums@pcworld.com. We'd love to hear your perspective.

Comments